
Smarter incentives, more homes
11.03.2025 - 09:12
Mandala, in partnership with the Property Council of Australia, has released a landmark report examining the economic benefits of achieving the National Housing Accord's 1.2 million new homes target by the end of FY2029. Our analysis reveals current projections fall 40% short of this ambitious goal. Successfully meeting the target would deliver substantial benefits: reducing weekly rents by $90 in well-located areas, moderating price growth, generating $128 billion in economic activity, and supporting 368,000 jobs annually. While the Australian Government's $3 billion New Homes Bonus incentive scheme establishes a strong foundation, our research identifies opportunities to enhance its effectiveness. The current retrospective payment structure and high thresholds limit jurisdictional engagement with the scheme. Mandala recommends a refined approach including earlier payments, extending the program timeframe, doubling funding, improving transparency through robust reporting, and strengthening federal leadership.
Australia's housing affordability challenge continues to deepen, with the time required to save for a house deposit in capital cities increasing to over 10 years. This challenge stems from insufficient housing supply, with Australia having fewer dwellings per capita than the OECD average, and historically low vacancy in existing homes.
The Australian Government has responded by setting an ambitious target of 1.2 million new well-located homes by the end of FY2029, through the National Housing Accord. Currently, Australia is forecast to achieve 60 per cent of the National Housing Accord’s target, with an uplift of 462,000 homes needed to reach 1.2 million new homes.
Accelerating housing construction to achieve the 1.2 million target would have large impacts on housing affordability. Rental prices could be reduced by $90 per week in well-located areas and housing price growth would slow. Further, the construction would contribute $128 billion in economic activity over the five years and support 368,000 jobs each year.
The target is supported by the $3 billion New Homes Bonus, designed to incentivise more housing construction. However, stakeholder consultation and analysis of previous incentive payment schemes suggest that the New Homes Bonus could be better designed to improve its efficacy. The current retrospective payment structure and high threshold requirements make the scheme challenging for jurisdictions to engage with effectively.
With the exception of the ACT, no state or territory is projected to meet the scheme's threshold within its current timeframe, potentially undermining its effectiveness as an incentive for reform.
To optimise the scheme's impact, the Australian Government should consider:
- refining the scheme by bringing forward payments and extending its duration to seven years to enable jurisdictions to undertake longer-term reforms
- increasing the total value to $6 billion to reflect the scale of the housing challenge and ring fencing any unspent funding for future housing supply initiatives
- strengthening transparency through clear public reporting on progress and establishing forums to share insights between jurisdictions
- enhancing Australian Government leadership through establishing a Housing Sub-Committee of Cabinet and considering all available levers to support housing supply
These changes would help ensure the New Homes Bonus effectively supports the critical goal of improving housing affordability across Australia, while fostering greater coordination between different levels of government in addressing this complex challenge.
Read full report here.
Read our latest posts

Attracting international capital
International investment has powered Australia's property sector, with international investors providing $1 in every $3 of institutional property investment over the past ten years. Yet in recent years, Victoria and Queensland have introduced additional taxes on these investors. This report examines a critical question: are these taxes deterring the investment Australia needs to build cities, create jobs, and support economic growth? Commissioned by the Property Council of Australia, the analysis reveals that Victoria has seen global institutional investment plummet by 53% since 2022, coinciding with rising tax rates. Queensland shows similar stagnation despite strong economic conditions. Through economic modelling and case studies of stalled projects - from student accommodation to industrial estates - the report quantifies what removing these surcharges could mean for Australia's economic future and competitiveness in attracting international capital.
24 Nov, 2025

Private Capital: Australia's Untapped Opportunity
Our latest research commissioned by the Australian Investment Council reveals regulatory barriers are constraining superannuation investment in private equity and venture capital (PEVC), costing retirees up to $20,000 and the economy 140,000 jobs. Despite PEVC delivering returns 10.8 percentage points higher than listed equity, Australian super funds allocate just 4.4% versus 14% for top global pension funds. Fixing the distortionary effects of RG 97 and Your Future Your Super would improve member outcomes and grow the pool of capital for Australian projects.
18 Nov, 2025

Advancing innovation and productivity in the care sector
Our latest research commissioned by Kismet Healthcare examines opportunities to advance innovation and productivity in Australia's care sector through targeted technological solutions. We identify four high-impact, low-risk opportunities that could deliver over $2 billion in annual productivity gains in the NDIS alone. This study highlights the need for governments to establish a strong digital care ecosystem to preserve the benefits of quality care while addressing rising demand from Australia's aging population.
10 Nov, 2025

Prevention pays: Cutting the cost of dental hospitalisations
Outlining the scale, impact and solutions to preventable dental hospitalisations in NSW.
17 Oct, 2025