Smarter incentives, more homes
11.03.2025 - 09:12
Mandala, in partnership with the Property Council of Australia, has released a landmark report examining the economic benefits of achieving the National Housing Accord's 1.2 million new homes target by the end of FY2029. Our analysis reveals current projections fall 40% short of this ambitious goal. Successfully meeting the target would deliver substantial benefits: reducing weekly rents by $90 in well-located areas, moderating price growth, generating $128 billion in economic activity, and supporting 368,000 jobs annually. While the Australian Government's $3 billion New Homes Bonus incentive scheme establishes a strong foundation, our research identifies opportunities to enhance its effectiveness. The current retrospective payment structure and high thresholds limit jurisdictional engagement with the scheme. Mandala recommends a refined approach including earlier payments, extending the program timeframe, doubling funding, improving transparency through robust reporting, and strengthening federal leadership.
Australia's housing affordability challenge continues to deepen, with the time required to save for a house deposit in capital cities increasing to over 10 years. This challenge stems from insufficient housing supply, with Australia having fewer dwellings per capita than the OECD average, and historically low vacancy in existing homes.
The Australian Government has responded by setting an ambitious target of 1.2 million new well-located homes by the end of FY2029, through the National Housing Accord. Currently, Australia is forecast to achieve 60 per cent of the National Housing Accord’s target, with an uplift of 462,000 homes needed to reach 1.2 million new homes.
Accelerating housing construction to achieve the 1.2 million target would have large impacts on housing affordability. Rental prices could be reduced by $90 per week in well-located areas and housing price growth would slow. Further, the construction would contribute $128 billion in economic activity over the five years and support 368,000 jobs each year.
The target is supported by the $3 billion New Homes Bonus, designed to incentivise more housing construction. However, stakeholder consultation and analysis of previous incentive payment schemes suggest that the New Homes Bonus could be better designed to improve its efficacy. The current retrospective payment structure and high threshold requirements make the scheme challenging for jurisdictions to engage with effectively.
With the exception of the ACT, no state or territory is projected to meet the scheme's threshold within its current timeframe, potentially undermining its effectiveness as an incentive for reform.
To optimise the scheme's impact, the Australian Government should consider:
- refining the scheme by bringing forward payments and extending its duration to seven years to enable jurisdictions to undertake longer-term reforms
- increasing the total value to $6 billion to reflect the scale of the housing challenge and ring fencing any unspent funding for future housing supply initiatives
- strengthening transparency through clear public reporting on progress and establishing forums to share insights between jurisdictions
- enhancing Australian Government leadership through establishing a Housing Sub-Committee of Cabinet and considering all available levers to support housing supply
These changes would help ensure the New Homes Bonus effectively supports the critical goal of improving housing affordability across Australia, while fostering greater coordination between different levels of government in addressing this complex challenge.
Read full report here.
Read our latest posts
Reducing out-of-pocket costs for Australian healthcare consumers
In partnership with Private Healthcare Australia (PHA), our latest report reveals the increasing strain of out-of-pocket healthcare costs on Australian consumers. Without urgent action, these costs could reach $1.6 billion by 2030, driven by limited competition, lack of price transparency, and weak consumer protections. Costs have already surged 12% in the past year, and 330,000 Australians are expected to delay care due to affordability concerns. Transparent pricing and stronger protections could save consumers millions. Read our full analysis to understand the challenges—and the solutions—that could make healthcare more accessible for all.
27 Mar, 2025
The Social Dividend: An Actuarial Case for Higher Income Support
Our new report explores the full impact of increasing JobSeeker—not just the economic benefits, but also the significant social returns and efficiency savings. Using actuarial techniques, micro-data analysis, and leading econometric research, we quantify the broader benefits of raising JobSeeker to 90% of the Age Pension. Our findings show that every $100 invested delivers a $24 social return, improving health outcomes, reducing justice system interactions, and lowering long-term welfare dependence. Importantly, the efficiency savings outweigh any potential reduction in job search intensity. This report provides new insights into why increasing JobSeeker is both a smart investment and a necessary reform.
27 Mar, 2025
20-years of Fitted for Work driving employment success
To mark 20 years of Fitted for Work, Mandala Partners conducted an economic analysis to quantify the organisation’s impact. Our findings show that for every $1 invested, Fitted for Work delivers $2.19 in immediate economic benefits, unlocking $86 million in value over two decades by supporting 45,000 clients. The analysis highlights that Fitted for Work reduces job search duration by half compared to the national average, significantly improving employment outcomes. Notably, the organisation has expanded its support for older women, addressing a critical and growing need in the community.
27 Mar, 2025
The value of shifting to four-year parliamentary terms
This research quantifies significant benefits of extending Commonwealth House of Representatives' terms from three to four years. While Australia's states and territories have adopted four-year terms, the Commonwealth remains among only eight countries globally with three-year or shorter terms.Our analysis shows potential gains of $59-71 billion over 20 years through reducing election frequency. Benefits include $4.6 billion in avoided direct costs, $40.7 billion in enhanced business investment from reduced electoral uncertainty, and $14-26 billion through improved government policy.
17 Mar, 2025