
Digital platforms and competition in Australia
24.07.2025 - 02:20
Our latest research in collaboration with Apple examines proposals to introduce an ex ante competition framework for digital platforms in Australia by assessing digital platform regulations in international jurisdictions. We find that jurisdictions that have implemented ex ante regimes have experienced implementation challenges, with consequences for users and the economy. This study highlights that the need for regulatory regimes to preserve the benefits delivered by platforms while maintaining the flexibility to adapt to rapidly evolving technologies.
Digital platforms are driving productivity and innovation across the Australian economy
- Tech sector labour productivity has grown 38% since 2007, far outpacing the national average of 14%
- By increasing tech adoption across small, medium and large businesses, digital platforms have transformed industries and driven innovation across the economy
- Australia's overall productivity has reached a 60-year low, making tech sector growth and and increased tech adoption critical

Treasury has proposed a new ex ante digital competition regime
- The proposal sets upfront rules for designated platforms without requiring evidence of harm
- The proposal outlines six areas which these rules would target, including interoperability requirements
- This would mark a departure from Australia’s current framework which has prioritised evidence based assessment of harms

International markets are adopting varied approaches to ex ante
- Some countries and regions (the EU in particular) have implemented ex ante measures for digital markets
- Others appear to be taking a ‘wait and see’ approach to ex ante, while some like the US see it as an unnecessary risk to innovation and investment
- The implementation of the EU’s Digital Markets Act has seen implementation challenges, with negative consequences for consumers and the economy

Government must weigh up the potential impacts of ex ante regulation
- There are no free lunches. Ex ante obligations targeting interoperability could require platforms to provide largely unfettered access to third parties, posing risks for privacy, safety and innovation
- There is emerging evidence that incentives for AI innovation have been distorted by ex ante obligations in the EU
- Regulatory frameworks must weigh up these challenges and remain adaptable to emerging technologies
Read the full report here.
Read our latest posts

Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve Design
Mandala's latest report for the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC) sets out an industry-informed approach to implementing Australia’s Critical Minerals Strategic Reserve, with a focus on rare earths critical to national security and the energy transition. Bringing together 10 Australian rare earth developers, and drawing on international precedents and economic analysis, the report recommends a commercially viable and fiscally sustainable model to support new investment in Australia’s rare earths sector while managing risk to taxpayers.
12 Jan, 2026

The Value of Online Payments to New Zealand Businesses
Mandala partnered with Stripe on a research report based on the findings of a survey of 200 New Zealand businesses around the value of online payments and opportunities for future innovation.
18 Dec, 2025

Optimising Australia’s Specialist Investment Vehicles for the Net Zero Journey
Mandala, in partnership with IGCC, explores how Australia’s Specialist Investment Vehicles (SIVs) are deploying public capital to accelerate the net zero transition. The report examines the current funding landscape, identifies structural challenges that limit the effectiveness of public investment, and sets out a pathway to evolve the SIV system into a more coordinated, capital-led model aligned with national priorities.
10 Dec, 2025

$160 billion and counting: The cost of Commonwealth regulatory complexity
Our latest research for the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) reveals Australia’s growing regulatory burden. The cost to businesses of complying with federal regulation has risen to $160 billion (5.8 per cent of GDP), up from $65 billion (4.2 per cent of GDP) in 2013. More complex laws are contributing to the increase in costs and redirecting business resources away from growth and innovation. Board time on compliance has doubled from 24 percent to 55 percent in 10 years, while the external legal spend now sits at $16bn up from $6bn in 2010. While the UK, EU, Canada, New Zealand and US are simplifying regulation to drive growth, Australia risks falling further behind without taking immediate policy action.
2 Dec, 2025