Building an AI-Empowered Workforce: Priority Framework
REPORT

Building an AI-Empowered Workforce: Priority Framework

clock

18.06.2024 - 06:21

AIWorkforceEducationTechnology

Building on the initial report with FSO into generative AI, ‘Impact of generative AI on skills in the workplace’, we have been examining how the training system should prioritise its response to the impact of this emerging technology on finance, technology and business training products. The report seeks to assist the FSO to prioritise areas for attention when collaborating with training providers and industry to help ensure finance, tech and business VET qualifications reflect the needs of the economy.

The prioritisation of qualifications should consider both AI exposure and importance

Generative AI will have a significant impact on the industries, occupations and qualifications that are covered by the FSO.

However, it is one factor among many others and should be considered holistically as part of the FSO’s workforce planning and prioritisation process.

Accordingly, we recommend a two-part test to prioritise action to respond to the impact of generative AI.

A. AI exposure – the extent to which the qualification has been identified as having a high exposure to generative AI.

B. Qualification importance – the extent to which the qualification plays a significant role in the training system and in industry.

The combination of these two factors will identify the most urgent qualifications to be reviewed for potential changes to respond to generative AI.

Qualification importance depends on factors relating to the qualification and its use, occupational size and growth & stakeholder feedback

portableText image

Qualifications with high importance and AI exposure should be prioritised

Using this prioritisation framework qualifications are allocated to the relevant priority

Critical priority: High exposure, high importance. There are 4 qualifications in this category, for example the Diploma of Marketing and Communication

High priority: High exposure, low importance. There are 27 qualifications in this category, for example the Certificate IV in Human Resource Management

Medium priority: Low exposure, high importance. There are 23 qualifications in this category for example the Certificate IV in Business

Lower priority: Low exposure, low importance. There are 35 qualifications in this category for example the Certificate II in Telecommunications Network Build and Operation

portableText image

Using this prioritisation framework qualifications can be allocated a priority rating

Qualifications will broadly fall into four categories: Critical priority (High exposure, high importance) these qualifications are critical to review. Occupations in this sector are of high importance for industry, and qualifications are most likely to be impacted by AI. High priority (high exposure, lower importance) these qualifications should be considered as high priority for review as while less important for industry, they will become impacted by AI and will require action to ensure relevance. Medium priority (low exposure, high importance) these qualifications are important for industry but are expected to have limited AI exposure and are therefore less in need of review. Lower priority (low exposure, low importance) qualifications in this category should either have no further action, or if they have low to no enrolments should be considered for deletion.

portableText image

Qualifications under critical priority

Diploma of Marketing and Communication

Advanced Diploma of Marketing and Communication

Advanced Diploma of Conveyancing

Diploma of Insurance Broking

Download the full report and methodology here.

Read our latest posts

$160 billion and counting: The cost of Commonwealth regulatory complexity
Productivity

$160 billion and counting: The cost of Commonwealth regulatory complexity

Our latest research for the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) reveals Australia’s growing regulatory burden. The cost to businesses of complying with federal regulation has risen to $160 billion (5.8 per cent of GDP), up from $65 billion (4.2 per cent of GDP) in 2013. More complex laws are contributing to the increase in costs and redirecting business resources away from growth and innovation. Board time on compliance has doubled from 24 percent to 55 percent in 10 years, while the external legal spend now sits at $16bn up from $6bn in 2010. While the UK, EU, Canada, New Zealand and US are simplifying regulation to drive growth, Australia risks falling further behind without taking immediate policy action.

2 Dec, 2025

Data Centres as Enabling Infrastructure
DataTechnologyAIEconomics

Data Centres as Enabling Infrastructure

Mandala’s latest research, commissioned for Data Centres Australia by AirTrunk, Amazon Web Services, CDC Data Centres and NEXTDC, shows that data centres are key drivers of economic growth, renewable energy investment, and sustainable water solutions. The report finds that data centres use relatively modest amounts of energy and water while generating significant economic value, investing in power and water infrastructure that benefits communities, and helping to accelerate Australia’s clean energy transition.

25 Nov, 2025

Attracting international capital
EconomicsCapital Markets

Attracting international capital

International investment has powered Australia's property sector, with international investors providing $1 in every $3 of institutional property investment over the past ten years. Yet in recent years, Victoria and Queensland have introduced additional taxes on these investors. This report examines a critical question: are these taxes deterring the investment Australia needs to build cities, create jobs, and support economic growth? Commissioned by the Property Council of Australia, the analysis reveals that Victoria has seen global institutional investment plummet by 53% since 2022, coinciding with rising tax rates. Queensland shows similar stagnation despite strong economic conditions. Through economic modelling and case studies of stalled projects - from student accommodation to industrial estates - the report quantifies what removing these surcharges could mean for Australia's economic future and competitiveness in attracting international capital.

24 Nov, 2025

Private Capital: Australia's Untapped Opportunity
SuperannuationEconomicsFinancial ServicesCapital Markets

Private Capital: Australia's Untapped Opportunity

Our latest research commissioned by the Australian Investment Council reveals regulatory barriers are constraining superannuation investment in private equity and venture capital (PEVC), costing retirees up to $20,000 and the economy 140,000 jobs. Despite PEVC delivering returns 10.8 percentage points higher than listed equity, Australian super funds allocate just 4.4% versus 14% for top global pension funds. Fixing the distortionary effects of RG 97 and Your Future Your Super would improve member outcomes and grow the pool of capital for Australian projects.

18 Nov, 2025

Loading...