Building an AI-Empowered Workforce: Priority Framework
REPORT

Building an AI-Empowered Workforce: Priority Framework

clock

18.06.2024 - 06:21

AIWorkforceEducationTechnology

Building on the initial report with FSO into generative AI, ‘Impact of generative AI on skills in the workplace’, we have been examining how the training system should prioritise its response to the impact of this emerging technology on finance, technology and business training products. The report seeks to assist the FSO to prioritise areas for attention when collaborating with training providers and industry to help ensure finance, tech and business VET qualifications reflect the needs of the economy.

The prioritisation of qualifications should consider both AI exposure and importance

Generative AI will have a significant impact on the industries, occupations and qualifications that are covered by the FSO.

However, it is one factor among many others and should be considered holistically as part of the FSO’s workforce planning and prioritisation process.

Accordingly, we recommend a two-part test to prioritise action to respond to the impact of generative AI.

A. AI exposure – the extent to which the qualification has been identified as having a high exposure to generative AI.

B. Qualification importance – the extent to which the qualification plays a significant role in the training system and in industry.

The combination of these two factors will identify the most urgent qualifications to be reviewed for potential changes to respond to generative AI.

Qualification importance depends on factors relating to the qualification and its use, occupational size and growth & stakeholder feedback

portableText image

Qualifications with high importance and AI exposure should be prioritised

Using this prioritisation framework qualifications are allocated to the relevant priority

Critical priority: High exposure, high importance. There are 4 qualifications in this category, for example the Diploma of Marketing and Communication

High priority: High exposure, low importance. There are 27 qualifications in this category, for example the Certificate IV in Human Resource Management

Medium priority: Low exposure, high importance. There are 23 qualifications in this category for example the Certificate IV in Business

Lower priority: Low exposure, low importance. There are 35 qualifications in this category for example the Certificate II in Telecommunications Network Build and Operation

portableText image

Using this prioritisation framework qualifications can be allocated a priority rating

Qualifications will broadly fall into four categories: Critical priority (High exposure, high importance) these qualifications are critical to review. Occupations in this sector are of high importance for industry, and qualifications are most likely to be impacted by AI. High priority (high exposure, lower importance) these qualifications should be considered as high priority for review as while less important for industry, they will become impacted by AI and will require action to ensure relevance. Medium priority (low exposure, high importance) these qualifications are important for industry but are expected to have limited AI exposure and are therefore less in need of review. Lower priority (low exposure, low importance) qualifications in this category should either have no further action, or if they have low to no enrolments should be considered for deletion.

portableText image

Qualifications under critical priority

Diploma of Marketing and Communication

Advanced Diploma of Marketing and Communication

Advanced Diploma of Conveyancing

Diploma of Insurance Broking

Download the full report and methodology here.

Read our latest posts

The Stagnant Nation: Lifting Australia’s Dynamism
Productivity

The Stagnant Nation: Lifting Australia’s Dynamism

Australians are going backwards on real wages and income. Real wage growth has fallen from 0.6 per cent in the 2000s to -0.7 per cent today, the slowest rate since the 1990s recession. Weak productivity growth is a key driver. Productivity growth has dropped from 2.2 per cent in the 1990s to just 0.1 per cent today. The Productivity Commission has pointed to declining economic dynamism as one cause for weak growth, with fewer businesses starting, growing and competing. We confirm declining economic dynamism across five key dimensions and estimate that reversing this decline seen since the mid-2000s could see a GDP uplift of $101 billion per year over the next decade. Our analysis finds that regulation could account for around 20 per cent of declining dynamism. Reducing regulatory burden to late-2000s levels could see GDP uplift of at least $20 billion per year over the next ten years.

7 Oct, 2026

Demonstrating the economic benefits of Airwallex in Australia
EconomicsFinTechTechnology

Demonstrating the economic benefits of Airwallex in Australia

Mandala's latest research, commissioned by Airwallex, quantifies the direct and indirect economic benefits of Airwallex in Australia. Airwallex supported $4.6 billion in economic benefits in 2025, a figure roughly equivalent to 2 per cent of the Australian tech sector's contribution to GDP. Of this, $2.5 billion flows directly to platform businesses through productivity gains, new market access and cost savings, with the remainder reaching the broader economy as those benefits move through customers' supply chains. Airwallex supports 29,000 jobs across the Australian economy, and a quarter of economic benefits flow to regional, rural and remote areas. Small and medium businesses capture the largest share of any business segment on the platform, $2.1 billion annually, or $200,000 in economic benefits for the average SMB each year.

16 Sep, 2026

Power to the people
United KingdomGovernmentDevolution

Power to the people

Mandala’s latest research examines how Greater Manchester turned devolved power into economic growth, why it worked, and what it could mean if similar powers were extended across England. Since devolution began in 2009, Greater Manchester’s economy has grown by nearly 45%, outperforming both the rest of England and the UK as a whole. Greater control over funding and policy has enabled the Mayor and Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) to coordinate investment in transport, housing, skills and economic development around local priorities. This has supported a 41% increase in bus journeys, recycled £300m of government capital into around £1bn of housing investment, delivering 11,000 dwellings, and increased employment in key sectors by over a quarter, compared with 14% across England. Integrating health and social care has also improved life expectancy, with the largest gains in self-reported health in the least healthy neighbourhoods. If local and combined authorities in England had these powers and replicated Manchester, we estimate an annual boost to the economy of up to £80bn, over 93,000 new homes, and £3.1bn in additional economic activity from improved life expectancy.

7 Sep, 2026

The Hidden Economy: Addressing Australia’s  Domestic Work and Care Divide
EconomicsAITechnologyGovernment

The Hidden Economy: Addressing Australia’s Domestic Work and Care Divide

Mandala’s research, in partnership with DoorDash Australia, examines the scale and distribution of Australia's unpaid household labour, the real costs it imposes on individuals and the economy, and the role that emerging technologies and policy reform could play in reducing and more equitably sharing that burden.

6 Sep, 2026

Loading...