Building an AI-Empowered Workforce: Priority Framework
REPORT

Building an AI-Empowered Workforce: Priority Framework

clock

18.06.2024 - 06:21

AIWorkforceEducationTechnology

Building on the initial report with FSO into generative AI, ‘Impact of generative AI on skills in the workplace’, we have been examining how the training system should prioritise its response to the impact of this emerging technology on finance, technology and business training products. The report seeks to assist the FSO to prioritise areas for attention when collaborating with training providers and industry to help ensure finance, tech and business VET qualifications reflect the needs of the economy.

The prioritisation of qualifications should consider both AI exposure and importance

Generative AI will have a significant impact on the industries, occupations and qualifications that are covered by the FSO.

However, it is one factor among many others and should be considered holistically as part of the FSO’s workforce planning and prioritisation process.

Accordingly, we recommend a two-part test to prioritise action to respond to the impact of generative AI.

A. AI exposure – the extent to which the qualification has been identified as having a high exposure to generative AI.

B. Qualification importance – the extent to which the qualification plays a significant role in the training system and in industry.

The combination of these two factors will identify the most urgent qualifications to be reviewed for potential changes to respond to generative AI.

Qualification importance depends on factors relating to the qualification and its use, occupational size and growth & stakeholder feedback

portableText image

Qualifications with high importance and AI exposure should be prioritised

Using this prioritisation framework qualifications are allocated to the relevant priority

Critical priority: High exposure, high importance. There are 4 qualifications in this category, for example the Diploma of Marketing and Communication

High priority: High exposure, low importance. There are 27 qualifications in this category, for example the Certificate IV in Human Resource Management

Medium priority: Low exposure, high importance. There are 23 qualifications in this category for example the Certificate IV in Business

Lower priority: Low exposure, low importance. There are 35 qualifications in this category for example the Certificate II in Telecommunications Network Build and Operation

portableText image

Using this prioritisation framework qualifications can be allocated a priority rating

Qualifications will broadly fall into four categories: Critical priority (High exposure, high importance) these qualifications are critical to review. Occupations in this sector are of high importance for industry, and qualifications are most likely to be impacted by AI. High priority (high exposure, lower importance) these qualifications should be considered as high priority for review as while less important for industry, they will become impacted by AI and will require action to ensure relevance. Medium priority (low exposure, high importance) these qualifications are important for industry but are expected to have limited AI exposure and are therefore less in need of review. Lower priority (low exposure, low importance) qualifications in this category should either have no further action, or if they have low to no enrolments should be considered for deletion.

portableText image

Qualifications under critical priority

Diploma of Marketing and Communication

Advanced Diploma of Marketing and Communication

Advanced Diploma of Conveyancing

Diploma of Insurance Broking

Download the full report and methodology here.

Read our latest posts

Revitalising National Competition Policy
Competition

Revitalising National Competition Policy

Mandala's submission to the National Competition Policy Unit on Revitalising National Competition Policy, focuses on realigning Australia's legislative settings on competition to meet the current realities of our economy.

4 Oct, 2024

The Zurich-Mandala Climate Risk Index: The impact of climate change on the Australian tourism industry
ClimateTourism

The Zurich-Mandala Climate Risk Index: The impact of climate change on the Australian tourism industry

Mandala Partners (Mandala) in conjunction with Zurich Financial Services Australia (Zurich) has produced Australia’s first Climate Risk Index for the Australian tourism sector. This report analyses the impact of climate change on Australia’s top tourism sites – including major airports, national parks, beaches and museums – under different Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenarios.

9 Sep, 2024

The benefits delivered by faster delivery
RetailCompetitionTechnology

The benefits delivered by faster delivery

Our latest report, commissioned by Amazon, presents new research measuring the improvements in delivery times over the last ten years and the benefits that have flowed to consumers, businesses, and the economy. Average delivery times have halved nationwide over the past 10 years. In metro areas and outer suburbs, average delivery times have fallen from 7-9 days to just 4 days. Online shoppers have saved 3.7 million hours per year. This improvement translates to $1.8 billion to businesses through more sales and lower costs. Read the full report to learn more.

21 Aug, 2024

Assessing the benefits of accelerated digital delivery of government services
Technology

Assessing the benefits of accelerated digital delivery of government services

Mandala's recent report commissioned by Adobe estimates the benefits of accelerating the adoption of digital transactions by shifting government transactions from traditional channels (in-person, mail and phone) to digital channels. Our report finds that accelerating digital adoption generates benefits for both government and citizens, such as $12 billion saved by governments over 10 years in service delivery costs, $3 billion saved by governments over 10 years due to improved cyber security and 800 million hours saved by citizens over 10 years in seeking and accessing government services (worth $19 billion to the Australian economy). Australia must overcome governance, finance and delivery challenges before it can achieve accelerated adoption. Read the full report to learn more.

20 Aug, 2024

Loading...