
Building an AI-Empowered Workforce: Priority Framework
18.06.2024 - 06:21
Building on the initial report with FSO into generative AI, ‘Impact of generative AI on skills in the workplace’, we have been examining how the training system should prioritise its response to the impact of this emerging technology on finance, technology and business training products. The report seeks to assist the FSO to prioritise areas for attention when collaborating with training providers and industry to help ensure finance, tech and business VET qualifications reflect the needs of the economy.
The prioritisation of qualifications should consider both AI exposure and importance
Generative AI will have a significant impact on the industries, occupations and qualifications that are covered by the FSO.
However, it is one factor among many others and should be considered holistically as part of the FSO’s workforce planning and prioritisation process.
Accordingly, we recommend a two-part test to prioritise action to respond to the impact of generative AI.
A. AI exposure – the extent to which the qualification has been identified as having a high exposure to generative AI.
B. Qualification importance – the extent to which the qualification plays a significant role in the training system and in industry.
The combination of these two factors will identify the most urgent qualifications to be reviewed for potential changes to respond to generative AI.
Qualification importance depends on factors relating to the qualification and its use, occupational size and growth & stakeholder feedback

Qualifications with high importance and AI exposure should be prioritised
Using this prioritisation framework qualifications are allocated to the relevant priority
Critical priority: High exposure, high importance. There are 4 qualifications in this category, for example the Diploma of Marketing and Communication
High priority: High exposure, low importance. There are 27 qualifications in this category, for example the Certificate IV in Human Resource Management
Medium priority: Low exposure, high importance. There are 23 qualifications in this category for example the Certificate IV in Business
Lower priority: Low exposure, low importance. There are 35 qualifications in this category for example the Certificate II in Telecommunications Network Build and Operation

Using this prioritisation framework qualifications can be allocated a priority rating
Qualifications will broadly fall into four categories: Critical priority (High exposure, high importance) these qualifications are critical to review. Occupations in this sector are of high importance for industry, and qualifications are most likely to be impacted by AI. High priority (high exposure, lower importance) these qualifications should be considered as high priority for review as while less important for industry, they will become impacted by AI and will require action to ensure relevance. Medium priority (low exposure, high importance) these qualifications are important for industry but are expected to have limited AI exposure and are therefore less in need of review. Lower priority (low exposure, low importance) qualifications in this category should either have no further action, or if they have low to no enrolments should be considered for deletion.

Qualifications under critical priority
Diploma of Marketing and Communication
Advanced Diploma of Marketing and Communication
Advanced Diploma of Conveyancing
Diploma of Insurance Broking
Download the full report and methodology here.
Read our latest posts

Rethinking the APR
Mandala's latest research, commissioned by Block, examines whether US credit disclosure requirements remain fit for purpose in a rapidly evolving lending market. Drawing on economic analysis, a survey of nearly 1,600 US consumers and small business decision-makers, and proprietary credit data, the report finds that Annual Percentage Rate (APR) disclosures can misrepresent the perceived cost of short-term borrowing and influence consumer choices. The report makes the case for modernising credit disclosure requirements, with a more flexible approach that better reflects different credit products while preserving consumer protection and access to credit.
15 Oct, 2026

The augmented attacker: the growing AI-driven cyber threat to Australian businesses
Mandala's latest research, commissioned by CyberCX (part of Accenture), shows that the AI-driven cyber threat to Australian businesses is growing. The report finds that AI could increase the frequency and severity of cyber incidents targeting Australian businesses. As AI-driven threats grow, Australian businesses could face losses reaching up to $37 billion a year. However, investing in foundational cyber defences such as patching known vulnerabilities could reduce annual losses from $37 billion to $13 billion, a $24 billion saving. Three-quarters of the savings are from preventative actions. The report highlights the actions required from businesses and government to improve cyber defence.
13 Oct, 2026

The Stagnant Nation: Lifting Australia’s Dynamism
Australians are going backwards on real wages and income. Real wage growth has fallen from 0.6 per cent in the 2000s to -0.7 per cent today, the slowest rate since the 1990s recession. Weak productivity growth is a key driver. Productivity growth has dropped from 2.2 per cent in the 1990s to just 0.1 per cent today. The Productivity Commission has pointed to declining economic dynamism as one cause for weak growth, with fewer businesses starting, growing and competing. We confirm declining economic dynamism across five key dimensions and estimate that reversing this decline seen since the mid-2000s could see a GDP uplift of $101 billion per year over the next decade. Our analysis finds that regulation could account for around 20 per cent of declining dynamism. Reducing regulatory burden to late-2000s levels could see GDP uplift of at least $20 billion per year over the next ten years.
7 Oct, 2026

Demonstrating the economic benefits of Airwallex in Australia
Mandala's latest research, commissioned by Airwallex, quantifies the direct and indirect economic benefits of Airwallex in Australia. Airwallex supported $4.6 billion in economic benefits in 2025, a figure roughly equivalent to 2 per cent of the Australian tech sector's contribution to GDP. Of this, $2.5 billion flows directly to platform businesses through productivity gains, new market access and cost savings, with the remainder reaching the broader economy as those benefits move through customers' supply chains. Airwallex supports 29,000 jobs across the Australian economy, and a quarter of economic benefits flow to regional, rural and remote areas. Small and medium businesses capture the largest share of any business segment on the platform, $2.1 billion annually, or $200,000 in economic benefits for the average SMB each year.
16 Sep, 2026