EVs: Raising standards, cutting costs
16.06.2023 - 07:20
In a new report for the Electric Vehicle Council, Mandala unpacks how an effective new vehicle efficiency standard can reduce vehicle emissions and save consumers money. Our analysis found that a well-designed NVES could deliver up to $13.6 billion in savings for Australians over the next decade, and also avoid up to 31 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions.
This study examines the potential impact of introducing a new vehicle efficiency standard in Australia
Australia needs a strong new vehicle efficiency standard (NVES) to catch up to its global peers and cut costs for motorists Implementing a strong NVES will reduce fuel and maintenance costs for consumers, as well as deliver substantial environmental benefits.
While the NVES would have a relatively modest impact on vehicle prices, this would be more than offset by cost savings over the life of the vehicle – making cars cheaper overall for consumers.
More than 85% of vehicles sold worldwide are covered by a NVES. Australia is currently one of the few developed nations, along with Russia, without a NVES.
The European Union (EU) has the strongest standard, requiring all new vehicles sold by 2035 to be zero-emissions vehicles.
Currently, the EU sells over 200 models of electric vehicles (EV) compared to just over 50 in Australia.
Meanwhile, new internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles in Australia emit up to 1.5 times more carbon dioxide than those in Europe – leaving a significant market gap between Australia and our global peers.
A strong standard will improve the efficiency of new vehicles and increase the supply of electric vehicles.
To assess the impact of the NVES on consumers, this study considers (a) the emissions intensity of new vehicles; (b) the supply of electric vehicles; and (c) the impact on vehicle prices.
Read our latest posts
Reducing out-of-pocket costs for Australian healthcare consumers
In partnership with Private Healthcare Australia (PHA), our latest report reveals the increasing strain of out-of-pocket healthcare costs on Australian consumers. Without urgent action, these costs could reach $1.6 billion by 2030, driven by limited competition, lack of price transparency, and weak consumer protections. Costs have already surged 12% in the past year, and 330,000 Australians are expected to delay care due to affordability concerns. Transparent pricing and stronger protections could save consumers millions. Read our full analysis to understand the challenges—and the solutions—that could make healthcare more accessible for all.
27 Mar, 2025
The Social Dividend: An Actuarial Case for Higher Income Support
Our new report explores the full impact of increasing JobSeeker—not just the economic benefits, but also the significant social returns and efficiency savings. Using actuarial techniques, micro-data analysis, and leading econometric research, we quantify the broader benefits of raising JobSeeker to 90% of the Age Pension. Our findings show that every $100 invested delivers a $24 social return, improving health outcomes, reducing justice system interactions, and lowering long-term welfare dependence. Importantly, the efficiency savings outweigh any potential reduction in job search intensity. This report provides new insights into why increasing JobSeeker is both a smart investment and a necessary reform.
27 Mar, 2025
20-years of Fitted for Work driving employment success
To mark 20 years of Fitted for Work, Mandala Partners conducted an economic analysis to quantify the organisation’s impact. Our findings show that for every $1 invested, Fitted for Work delivers $2.19 in immediate economic benefits, unlocking $86 million in value over two decades by supporting 45,000 clients. The analysis highlights that Fitted for Work reduces job search duration by half compared to the national average, significantly improving employment outcomes. Notably, the organisation has expanded its support for older women, addressing a critical and growing need in the community.
27 Mar, 2025
The value of shifting to four-year parliamentary terms
This research quantifies significant benefits of extending Commonwealth House of Representatives' terms from three to four years. While Australia's states and territories have adopted four-year terms, the Commonwealth remains among only eight countries globally with three-year or shorter terms.Our analysis shows potential gains of $59-71 billion over 20 years through reducing election frequency. Benefits include $4.6 billion in avoided direct costs, $40.7 billion in enhanced business investment from reduced electoral uncertainty, and $14-26 billion through improved government policy.
17 Mar, 2025