Economic impact of removing radio caps for sound recordings
REPORT

Economic impact of removing radio caps for sound recordings

clock

14.06.2024 - 07:02

Economics

Mandala's latest report with PPCA explores the economic impact of removing radio caps for sound recordings on Australian artist incomes, the potential investment in Australian artists and music from increased revenue, and the likely impact on radio profit margins from higher royalty rates. We have found that removing the caps could lead to an additional $4.8 million paid to Australian artists in royalties in 2024-25 and artists played on radio could see up to $19,100 in additional income per year, or a 78% increase in income. If caps are removed, increased reinvestment from record labels could see double the number of new local artists played on radio for the first time.

Radio caps have artificially constrained artist income since 1968

Radio caps were introduced as part of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) which limits the amount that radio broadcasters pay in royalties for sound recording copyright. This cap was set (in 1968) at 1% of broadcast revenue for commercial radio broadcasters, and $0.005 per head of the population for the ABC.

Since then, there have been six reviews recommending the removal of them.

portableText image

The actual royalty rate paid by commercial radio stations Australia is 0.4% of broadcast revenue. This is significantly lower than other comparable benchmarks. No cap exists on musical works copyright, which has an average royalty rate of around 3.6%. Other international rates for sound recordings are also much higher. Countries such as Canada, UK and Germany have rates between 3% and 7.5%.

To estimate the impact of removing radio caps, we have considered a scenario where radio broadcasters pay sound recording royalties at the same rate as musical works. This is an example only, noting rates would be determined by negotiation and the Copyright Tribunal per existing processes.

Removing the radio caps could increase music income of the most played artists by 78%

Artists are at breaking point and typically work several jobs to support themselves. 83% of artists hold multiple jobs, with 65% of artists relying on a non-music job as their main source of income. Festivals, which have been a key source of income for artists, are also being cancelled at a higher rate.

Data shows Australian artists played on the radio received $0.6m in sound recording copyright royalties in FY23.

Removing radio caps could lead to an additional $4.8m being paid to Australian artists in royalties in FY25. For Australia’s most played artists, this could be up to $19,100 in additional income per year, or a 78% increase in income from music.

portableText imageportableText image

Removing radio caps could double the number of new Australian artists played on the radio for the first time

Record labels play an important role in partnering with artists, investing and supporting creative development and driving their commercial success. In particular, record label investment in artists and repertoire (A&R) helps to identify and develop promising talent, and grow the music industry.

Removing radio caps would increase record label revenue and
their ability to invest in the Australian music industry. For Australian repertoire alone, record labels would receive an additional $4.2m if radio caps were removed.

portableText image

Data also shows a strong, positive relationship between record label revenue and the number of artists per country. The corresponding increase in record label revenue, and investment, from removing radio caps would almost double the number of additional new Australian artists being played on the radio (and receiving royalties) each year.

Radio companies are well resourced and capable of paying higher rates

The radio industry allege that removing radio caps would make radio broadcast, particularly for local stations, commercial unviable. However, analysis indicates that radio stations are more profitable than the Australian industry average and the industry is dominated by a small number of large players.

The Australian radio industry has some of the highest revenue per capita globally. The four largest commercial radio stations account for close to $1 billion in revenue and all maintain healthy profit margins ranging between 12% and 21%. Together with the ABC, these players account for 85% of all industry revenue for the radio broadcast industry.

portableText image

These companies are also capable of paying higher rates. If the four largest commercial radio companies paid sound recording royalties at the same rate as musical works, they would have an average profit margin of 15%, which is still higher than other Australian industries on average. For the broader radio industry, paying higher rates would marginally reduce profit margins from 13% to 11%.

portableText image

The ABC currently pay $130,000 per year for sound recording royalties, out of a total budget of almost $1.3bn. Paying sound recording royalties at the same rate as musical works would account for less than 0.3% of ABC’s total annual budget.

Removing the radio caps is an effective, low-cost way to deliver on the Government’s objective to support the arts industry and promote Australian talent.

Read the full report here.

Read our latest posts

How EV adoption insulates Australia against oil supply shocks
EVsElectricInternational

How EV adoption insulates Australia against oil supply shocks

Mandala’s latest research finds that the adoption of electric vehicles is helping to insulate Australians from the oil supply shocks. This analysis looks at the contribution of Australia’s electric vehicle fleet to our petrol reserves, as well as the savings in fuel costs for Australian households.

16 Mar, 2026

Shaping the Australian banking system for a changing economy
Financial servicesEconomics

Shaping the Australian banking system for a changing economy

Mandala’s latest research, prepared for the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, finds that Australian banking has been transformed beyond recognition by technology, globalisation, and regulatory change. However, policy has not kept pace. Major banks now face a shrinking revenue base while providing a growing suite of collective goods including regional branches, ATM networks, and payment infrastructure, that comparable financial institutions are not required to provide. The report finds that declining profitability and an uneven regulatory playing field amid rising geopolitical uncertainty place Australia's financial resilience at risk. It recommends three principles for policymakers to shape Australia’s banking system to best serve our national interest. First, consider system-wide impacts of policy settings. Second, apply the same obligations to firms conducting the same activities with the same risk. Third, assess how overseas firms operating in critical parts of the financial system would behave in a crisis.

15 Mar, 2026

The Fragmentation Tax
RetailGovernmentProductivity

The Fragmentation Tax

Australian retailers operate across a patchwork of inconsistent state and territory regulations that, left unchecked, will cost the economy $26 billion and households $9.4 billion over the next decade. Commissioned by the Australian Retail Council, this Mandala report finds that regulatory fragmentation in retail - Australia's second-largest employer, generating $649 billion in economic activity annually - is compounding the country's productivity crisis at the worst possible time. The report identifies specific issues in transport and logistics, and packaging and waste as priority areas for reform, where harmonisation alone would inject up to $1.65 billion into the economy over 10 years. It recommends the Federal Government use its National Competition Policy framework to drive reform - including a $260 million increase to the National Productivity Fund, a new National Harmonisation Council, and a mandate that Regulatory Impact Statements explicitly quantify fragmentation risks.

23 Feb, 2026

Reforming Victoria's Windfall Gains Tax
GovernmentEconomicsHousing

Reforming Victoria's Windfall Gains Tax

Victoria's Windfall Gains Tax (WGT), introduced in July 2023, has compounded a decade of new and increased property taxes that have made Melbourne the most costly major city in Australia for development. Commissioned by the Property Council Victoria, this Mandala report finds that developer taxes and charges now account for 18% of total costs on Melbourne developments - double the rate of Sydney - and that the average WGT liability pushes project returns below the viability threshold. The analysis estimates that removing the WGT could unlock $1.4 billion in additional annual investment, support 2,700 jobs and deliver the equivalent of 3,100 new homes per year by 2030. The report also presents a suite of targeted reforms across financial relief, predictability, and policy alignment that would restore investor confidence while balancing the government's revenue objectives.

23 Feb, 2026

Loading...