Competition in clearing and settlement
14.09.2023 - 06:12
Mandala's latest research explores 'From Laggard to Leader: Why the capabilities that power Australia’s Clearing & Settlement services are falling behind global leaders, and how we can get back to the front of the pack'. Read on to find out more.
Australia is falling behind global leaders in financial market capabilities, and urgent action is required to claim our position at the front of the pack
In the early 2000s, Australia was at the forefront of global financial markets capabilities. The stock exchange had adopted electronic trade execution, clearing and settlement ahead of many other global markets. Sydney was ranked 7th on the Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI) as of 2007.
However, Australia’s financial market infrastructure and related regulatory architecture has failed to keep pace with global changes, specifically as new innovations such as distributed ledger technologies (DLT) emerged. This is starkest in Clearing and Settlement (C&S) where the Clearing House Electronic Subregister System (CHESS) was world leading when introduced in 1994 but its underlying technology is now outdated, limiting Australia's ability to continue to improve the service levels and performance of post-trade services. Sydney is now ranked 13th, behind cities in the US, Europe and Asia, while Melbourne had fallen from 18th in 2007 to 31st in 2022.
In 2015, the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR) recommended reforms to Australia’s C&S markets to increase competition aimed at driving innovative improvements in service and cost. However, relatively little has changed since. Over the period 2016-2022, the Australia Securities Exchange (ASX) announced and then failed to implement a DLT-based solution to replace the existing CHESS system, leaving Australia behind global leaders.
There is an urgent need to overcome the challenges posed by the monopoly that ASX currently holds over key aspects of the C&S of listed securities in Australia. In December 2022, Treasury proposed new legislation to address these issues and introduce responsible competition in C&S markets. This aims to boost competition, improve stability, reduce risks and lower costs, in turn fostering innovation and delivering benefits to the broader financial ecosystem.
Modernising Clearing & Settlement services and infrastructure has been beneficial for financial markets overseas
C&S services, currently provided exclusively by the ASX for listed securities, enables the exchange of financial assets between parties. They are critical to the successful operation of Australia’s financial markets, minimising counterparty risk, and providing efficiency and stability for participants.
Introducing responsible competition in global C&S markets has led to three key benefits: (1) enhanced innovation; (2) increased efficiency; and (3) lower costs for participants.
Competition has facilitated new technological innovations, such as DLT and atomic settlement, which are changing the way in which C&S services are delivered. For example, DLT and atomic settlement can eliminate the need for settlement, delivering capital efficiency and reducing risks.
Innovation in global markets has also pushed markets to shorter settlement cycles. European markets moved to T+2 settlement cycles in 2014, while other major financial markets are now considering a T+1 cycle.
Globally, C&S fees have fallen from greater competition and innovation, with fee reductions of up to 80 per cent.
Delivering modern, competitive Clearing & Settlement services requires responsible regulatory reform to deliver for investors, consumers and businesses
New technological innovations are requiring regulators to reconsider the traditional definition of C&S. Globally, these new innovations are changing the nature of C&S, the types of assets being cleared, and the market participants. These changes can have positive outcomes for investors, consumers and businesses.
There are three main challenges being addressed through technological advancement and regulatory innovations: (1) lengthy settlement times; (2) manual processes; and (3) bilateral clearing of risky instruments.
However, Australia’s regulatory approaches have not been updated to enable use of new technologies to overcome these challenges, and require reform to support a modern C&S market that spurs innovation and delivers broad benefits.
Australia can be a leader in financial market innovation and technology in a way that is both responsible and beneficial
Government and industry must work together to design a modernised regulatory framework that delivers reliable, stable, efficient and secure financial markets.
Adopting a phased, risk-calibrated approach to introduce competition in C&S services will enable all relevant stakeholders to maintain confidence in the reliability, stability and security of Australia’s financial markets, while allowing Australia to reclaim its former position at the global frontier of financial markets infrastructure.
There are three key phases to returning Australia to the global frontier of financial markets:
1. Grant regulatory relief for new entrants in C&S markets.
2. Enable interoperability amongst C&S systems.
3. Evolve the market structure to ensure responsible competition in C&S markets.
Read our latest posts
How EV adoption insulates Australia against oil supply shocks
Mandala’s latest research finds that the adoption of electric vehicles is helping to insulate Australians from the oil supply shocks. This analysis looks at the contribution of Australia’s electric vehicle fleet to our petrol reserves, as well as the savings in fuel costs for Australian households.
16 Mar, 2026
Shaping the Australian banking system for a changing economy
Mandala’s latest research, prepared for the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, finds that Australian banking has been transformed beyond recognition by technology, globalisation, and regulatory change. However, policy has not kept pace. Major banks now face a shrinking revenue base while providing a growing suite of collective goods including regional branches, ATM networks, and payment infrastructure, that comparable financial institutions are not required to provide. The report finds that declining profitability and an uneven regulatory playing field amid rising geopolitical uncertainty place Australia's financial resilience at risk. It recommends three principles for policymakers to shape Australia’s banking system to best serve our national interest. First, consider system-wide impacts of policy settings. Second, apply the same obligations to firms conducting the same activities with the same risk. Third, assess how overseas firms operating in critical parts of the financial system would behave in a crisis.
15 Mar, 2026
The Fragmentation Tax
Australian retailers operate across a patchwork of inconsistent state and territory regulations that, left unchecked, will cost the economy $26 billion and households $9.4 billion over the next decade. Commissioned by the Australian Retail Council, this Mandala report finds that regulatory fragmentation in retail - Australia's second-largest employer, generating $649 billion in economic activity annually - is compounding the country's productivity crisis at the worst possible time. The report identifies specific issues in transport and logistics, and packaging and waste as priority areas for reform, where harmonisation alone would inject up to $1.65 billion into the economy over 10 years. It recommends the Federal Government use its National Competition Policy framework to drive reform - including a $260 million increase to the National Productivity Fund, a new National Harmonisation Council, and a mandate that Regulatory Impact Statements explicitly quantify fragmentation risks.
23 Feb, 2026
Reforming Victoria's Windfall Gains Tax
Victoria's Windfall Gains Tax (WGT), introduced in July 2023, has compounded a decade of new and increased property taxes that have made Melbourne the most costly major city in Australia for development. Commissioned by the Property Council Victoria, this Mandala report finds that developer taxes and charges now account for 18% of total costs on Melbourne developments - double the rate of Sydney - and that the average WGT liability pushes project returns below the viability threshold. The analysis estimates that removing the WGT could unlock $1.4 billion in additional annual investment, support 2,700 jobs and deliver the equivalent of 3,100 new homes per year by 2030. The report also presents a suite of targeted reforms across financial relief, predictability, and policy alignment that would restore investor confidence while balancing the government's revenue objectives.
23 Feb, 2026