
Default Dividend: How a default retirement product can help Australians retire with confidence
26.02.2024 - 08:30
A new study conducted by economics firm Mandala examines the minimum standards for a default retirement income product for Australians in retirement, and how many are likely to use and benefit from such a product. Similar to the accumulation phase, a default product will not be appropriate for everyone. However, as of 2023 there are 1.4 million Australians that are likely to use and benefit from a default retirement product. This could grow by 1.9 million to 3.3 million Australians by 2040. For these Australians, a default product will provide them with a safety net that improves financial outcomes in retirement. This study provides a guiding framework for designing a default retirement income product for Australia’s superannuation system.
Australia’s maturing superannuation system warrants a retirement phase solution that benefits its members
Over the last three decades, Australia has developed a world class retirement income system. This includes a superannuation system that has accumulated more than $3.5 trillion in savings since the early 1990s. This has been underpinned by the Superannuation Guarantee (SG), preservation of these savings until 55 to 60 years of age, and strong fund performance that has delivered 8 per cent returns over the past decade. These strong settings have placed Australia 6th on the Global Pension Index (GPI) as of 2022.

As Australia’s superannuation system matures, there are a growing number of Australians moving into retirement with large superannuation balances. The typical Australian retiring in the next three decades could have a balance of up to $500,000 (2023 dollars) by the time they can access their superannuation savings. With this structural change imminent, there is a need for Australia to evolve its current policy architecture to reflect the importance of the retirement phase of the superannuation system, and support those transitioning into retirement.
Without the right retirement product, Australians moving into retirement could be losing out on thousands of their savings. For example, Australians that continue to hold an accumulation phase account will be subjected to earnings tax – costing the typical Australian that is eligible to retire up to $1,900 in a year. Similarly, Australians that opt to withdraw their savings in a lump sum could be missing out on up to $3,800 of additional earnings in a year if they had a retirement product invested in a balanced asset allocation.
While advice can be an important part of the solution, policy settings could be improved by introducing a default retirement product. Given this, there is a need to identify how the Government and industry should design a default retirement product, and who is likely to use and benefit from it.
Default retirement products need to be flexible, have an appropriate asset allocation and minimum safeguards to protect the interests of Australians
To protect the interests of Australians transitioning into retirement, a default retirement product needs to be flexible, have an appropriate asset allocation and minimum safeguards.
Retirement products have an inherent trade-off between flexibility and longevity risk. Account-based pensions provide members with significant flexibility and choice, however this is at the cost of managing longevity risk. On the other hand, annuities provide protection against longevity risk, but provide very limited choice and flexibility to members. While a default retirement product follows a generalist approach, it may not address individualised needs for all retirees. Therefore, it is critical for a default product to be reversible, ensuring Australians maintain control over their savings and retirement.
High levels of flexibility come at the expense of traditional longevity protection offered by products such as annuities. Default retirement products should have appropriate asset allocation that helps to manage risks associated with longevity and inflation. This will require exposure to growth asset categories such as equities, property and infrastructure.
Default products need to also be complemented with minimum safeguards focused on protecting the interests of Australians in retirement. At a minimum, retirement products that are eligible for defaulting should be (i) performance tested and included in a comparison tool; (ii) have low fees; and (iii) be standardised to ensure easy comparability.
The introduction of a default retirement product can be government-led, industry-led, or collaboration between the two.

By 2040, there could be 3.3 million retired Australians using and benefiting from a default retirement income product
Just like the accumulation phase, a default product will not be appropriate for everyone. However, as of 2023 there are 1.4 million Australians that are likely to use and benefit from a default retirement product.

This could grow by 1.9 million to 3.3 million Australians by 2040. For these Australians, a default product will provide them with a safety net that improves financial outcomes in retirement.

Next steps in superannuation policy reform
Reforming the existing policy settings and enabling these Australians to benefit from a default retirement product requires a three-phased approach:
1) Update legislative and regulatory frameworks to define the core objective of superannuation.
2) Establish frameworks and regulatory requirements for the default retirement product.
3) Evolve industry standards to introduce default retirement products for all Australians.
Download the full report here.
Read our latest posts

The Stagnant Nation: Lifting Australia’s Dynamism
Australians are going backwards on real wages and income. Real wage growth has fallen from 0.6 per cent in the 2000s to -0.7 per cent today, the slowest rate since the 1990s recession. Weak productivity growth is a key driver. Productivity growth has dropped from 2.2 per cent in the 1990s to just 0.1 per cent today. The Productivity Commission has pointed to declining economic dynamism as one cause for weak growth, with fewer businesses starting, growing and competing. We confirm declining economic dynamism across five key dimensions and estimate that reversing this decline seen since the mid-2000s could see a GDP uplift of $101 billion per year over the next decade. Our analysis finds that regulation could account for around 20 per cent of declining dynamism. Reducing regulatory burden to late-2000s levels could see GDP uplift of at least $20 billion per year over the next ten years.
7 Oct, 2026

Demonstrating the economic benefits of Airwallex in Australia
Mandala's latest research, commissioned by Airwallex, quantifies the direct and indirect economic benefits of Airwallex in Australia. Airwallex supported $4.6 billion in economic benefits in 2025, a figure roughly equivalent to 2 per cent of the Australian tech sector's contribution to GDP. Of this, $2.5 billion flows directly to platform businesses through productivity gains, new market access and cost savings, with the remainder reaching the broader economy as those benefits move through customers' supply chains. Airwallex supports 29,000 jobs across the Australian economy, and a quarter of economic benefits flow to regional, rural and remote areas. Small and medium businesses capture the largest share of any business segment on the platform, $2.1 billion annually, or $200,000 in economic benefits for the average SMB each year.
16 Sep, 2026

Power to the people
Mandala’s latest research examines how Greater Manchester turned devolved power into economic growth, why it worked, and what it could mean if similar powers were extended across England. Since devolution began in 2009, Greater Manchester’s economy has grown by nearly 45%, outperforming both the rest of England and the UK as a whole. Greater control over funding and policy has enabled the Mayor and Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) to coordinate investment in transport, housing, skills and economic development around local priorities. This has supported a 41% increase in bus journeys, recycled £300m of government capital into around £1bn of housing investment, delivering 11,000 dwellings, and increased employment in key sectors by over a quarter, compared with 14% across England. Integrating health and social care has also improved life expectancy, with the largest gains in self-reported health in the least healthy neighbourhoods. If local and combined authorities in England had these powers and replicated Manchester, we estimate an annual boost to the economy of up to £80bn, over 93,000 new homes, and £3.1bn in additional economic activity from improved life expectancy.
7 Sep, 2026

The Hidden Economy: Addressing Australia’s Domestic Work and Care Divide
Mandala’s research, in partnership with DoorDash Australia, examines the scale and distribution of Australia's unpaid household labour, the real costs it imposes on individuals and the economy, and the role that emerging technologies and policy reform could play in reducing and more equitably sharing that burden.
6 Sep, 2026