Default Dividend: How a default retirement product can help Australians retire with confidence
REPORT

Default Dividend: How a default retirement product can help Australians retire with confidence

clock

26.02.2024 - 08:30

Superannuation

A new study conducted by economics firm Mandala examines the minimum standards for a default retirement income product for Australians in retirement, and how many are likely to use and benefit from such a product. Similar to the accumulation phase, a default product will not be appropriate for everyone. However, as of 2023 there are 1.4 million Australians that are likely to use and benefit from a default retirement product. This could grow by 1.9 million to 3.3 million Australians by 2040. For these Australians, a default product will provide them with a safety net that improves financial outcomes in retirement. This study provides a guiding framework for designing a default retirement income product for Australia’s superannuation system.


Australia’s maturing superannuation system warrants a retirement phase solution that benefits its members

Over the last three decades, Australia has developed a world class retirement income system. This includes a superannuation system that has accumulated more than $3.5 trillion in savings since the early 1990s. This has been underpinned by the Superannuation Guarantee (SG), preservation of these savings until 55 to 60 years of age, and strong fund performance that has delivered 8 per cent returns over the past decade. These strong settings have placed Australia 6th on the Global Pension Index (GPI) as of 2022.

portableText image


As Australia’s superannuation system matures, there are a growing number of Australians moving into retirement with large superannuation balances. The typical Australian retiring in the next three decades could have a balance of up to $500,000 (2023 dollars) by the time they can access their superannuation savings. With this structural change imminent, there is a need for Australia to evolve its current policy architecture to reflect the importance of the retirement phase of the superannuation system, and support those transitioning into retirement.

Without the right retirement product, Australians moving into retirement could be losing out on thousands of their savings. For example, Australians that continue to hold an accumulation phase account will be subjected to earnings tax – costing the typical Australian that is eligible to retire up to $1,900 in a year. Similarly, Australians that opt to withdraw their savings in a lump sum could be missing out on up to $3,800 of additional earnings in a year if they had a retirement product invested in a balanced asset allocation.

While advice can be an important part of the solution, policy settings could be improved by introducing a default retirement product. Given this, there is a need to identify how the Government and industry should design a default retirement product, and who is likely to use and benefit from it.

Default retirement products need to be flexible, have an appropriate asset allocation and minimum safeguards to protect the interests of Australians

To protect the interests of Australians transitioning into retirement, a default retirement product needs to be flexible, have an appropriate asset allocation and minimum safeguards.

Retirement products have an inherent trade-off between flexibility and longevity risk. Account-based pensions provide members with significant flexibility and choice, however this is at the cost of managing longevity risk. On the other hand, annuities provide protection against longevity risk, but provide very limited choice and flexibility to members. While a default retirement product follows a generalist approach, it may not address individualised needs for all retirees. Therefore, it is critical for a default product to be reversible, ensuring Australians maintain control over their savings and retirement.

High levels of flexibility come at the expense of traditional longevity protection offered by products such as annuities. Default retirement products should have appropriate asset allocation that helps to manage risks associated with longevity and inflation. This will require exposure to growth asset categories such as equities, property and infrastructure.

Default products need to also be complemented with minimum safeguards focused on protecting the interests of Australians in retirement. At a minimum, retirement products that are eligible for defaulting should be (i) performance tested and included in a comparison tool; (ii) have low fees; and (iii) be standardised to ensure easy comparability.

The introduction of a default retirement product can be government-led, industry-led, or collaboration between the two.

portableText image


By 2040, there could be 3.3 million retired Australians using and benefiting from a default retirement income product

Just like the accumulation phase, a default product will not be appropriate for everyone. However, as of 2023 there are 1.4 million Australians that are likely to use and benefit from a default retirement product.

portableText image

This could grow by 1.9 million to 3.3 million Australians by 2040. For these Australians, a default product will provide them with a safety net that improves financial outcomes in retirement.

portableText image

Next steps in superannuation policy reform

Reforming the existing policy settings and enabling these Australians to benefit from a default retirement product requires a three-phased approach:

1) Update legislative and regulatory frameworks to define the core objective of superannuation.

2) Establish frameworks and regulatory requirements for the default retirement product.

3) Evolve industry standards to introduce default retirement products for all Australians.


Download the full report here.

Read our latest posts

Decarbonising Australia’s road freight network
EVsElectricNet zeroClimateEconomicsGovernment

Decarbonising Australia’s road freight network

Mandala’s latest research, prepared for Energy Futures Foundation, sets out a policy roadmap for decarbonising Australia’s road freight network which could help to drive economic, environmental and social benefits. Emissions in the transport sector grew 0.3 Mt CO2-e in 2025. Emissions in all other sectors fell. Australia has a critical window to decarbonise its road freight network, but the current policy settings have Australia on the wrong track. A policy suite that targets cost, infrastructure and regulatory barriers could add an additional 1.5 million battery electric trucks to the road by 2050 and be cost neutral for the budget. Setting up the right policies now could deliver $138 billion in economic growth over the next 25 years, create 900 thousand jobs by 2050 and reduce emissions by 181 Mt CO2-e – equivalent to 41% of Australia’s 2025 annual emissions. These policies would also save 3,300 lives and reduce externality costs associated with heavy vehicles by $18.5 billion by 2050.

27 Mar, 2026

How EV adoption insulates Australia against oil supply shocks
EVsElectricInternational

How EV adoption insulates Australia against oil supply shocks

Mandala’s latest research finds that the adoption of electric vehicles is helping to insulate Australians from the oil supply shocks. This analysis looks at the contribution of Australia’s electric vehicle fleet to our petrol reserves, as well as the savings in fuel costs for Australian households.

16 Mar, 2026

Shaping the Australian banking system for a changing economy
Financial servicesEconomics

Shaping the Australian banking system for a changing economy

Mandala’s latest research, prepared for the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, finds that Australian banking has been transformed beyond recognition by technology, globalisation, and regulatory change. However, policy has not kept pace. Major banks now face a shrinking revenue base while providing a growing suite of collective goods including regional branches, ATM networks, and payment infrastructure, that comparable financial institutions are not required to provide. The report finds that declining profitability and an uneven regulatory playing field amid rising geopolitical uncertainty place Australia's financial resilience at risk. It recommends three principles for policymakers to shape Australia’s banking system to best serve our national interest. First, consider system-wide impacts of policy settings. Second, apply the same obligations to firms conducting the same activities with the same risk. Third, assess how overseas firms operating in critical parts of the financial system would behave in a crisis.

15 Mar, 2026

The Fragmentation Tax
RetailGovernmentProductivity

The Fragmentation Tax

Australian retailers operate across a patchwork of inconsistent state and territory regulations that, left unchecked, will cost the economy $26 billion and households $9.4 billion over the next decade. Commissioned by the Australian Retail Council, this Mandala report finds that regulatory fragmentation in retail - Australia's second-largest employer, generating $649 billion in economic activity annually - is compounding the country's productivity crisis at the worst possible time. The report identifies specific issues in transport and logistics, and packaging and waste as priority areas for reform, where harmonisation alone would inject up to $1.65 billion into the economy over 10 years. It recommends the Federal Government use its National Competition Policy framework to drive reform - including a $260 million increase to the National Productivity Fund, a new National Harmonisation Council, and a mandate that Regulatory Impact Statements explicitly quantify fragmentation risks.

23 Feb, 2026

Loading...