
$160 billion and counting: The cost of Commonwealth regulatory complexity
02.12.2025 - 11:44
Our latest research for the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) reveals Australia’s growing regulatory burden. The cost to businesses of complying with federal regulation has risen to $160 billion (5.8 per cent of GDP), up from $65 billion (4.2 per cent of GDP) in 2013. More complex laws are contributing to the increase in costs and redirecting business resources away from growth and innovation. Board time on compliance has doubled from 24 percent to 55 percent in 10 years, while the external legal spend now sits at $16bn up from $6bn in 2010. While the UK, EU, Canada, New Zealand and US are simplifying regulation to drive growth, Australia risks falling further behind without taking immediate policy action.
Compliance with federal regulations costs Australia $160 billion, or around 5.8 per cent of GDP in 2024. The burden of compliance has increased since the last time Australia conducted a regulatory stocktake in 2013, when compliance was determined to cost $65 billion or 4.2 per cent of GDP. This does not include the cost of compliance with state and local government regulations, which would add additional burden.
Australia’s productivity is lower than peer countries, with a simultaneously higher regulatory burden. Productivity growth has reached its lowest point in 60 years. Australia’s productivity is much lower and our regulatory burden is higher than the OECD average. Addressing Australia’s growing regulatory burden is one lever in improving the nation’s productivity. Australia’s weak productivity growth is in part attributed to the growing regulatory burden facing our businesses. More resources being directed towards regulation drives up costs and directs effort away from productivity enhancing activities.
The regulatory landscape in Australia has expanded and become more complex in recent decades. More regulations are being added for businesses to comply with, with double the number of federal regulations and triple the pages since 2000.
Businesses are diverting resources towards compliance in response to an expanding regulatory burden. Compliance roles have doubled since 2010, shifting labour costs towards compliance and growing faster than overall employment. Across the same time period, legal spending and board time spent on compliance have both doubled.
Spending on compliance indirectly hampers business investment. A 0.1 per cent increase in the share of compliance workers, similar to the change over the past decade, is associated with a $10.4 billion reduction in investment.
Regulatory reform is urgently needed, and it requires addressing the existing stock of regulation and the flow of new regulation.
To address existing regulation, AICD recommends:
- Committing to a 25 per cent reduction in regulatory costs by 2030
- Lifting the thresholds for large proprietary companies and Group 3 climate reporting entities, which could save $1.7 billion over four years
- Adopting in full the Australian Law Reform Commission’s recommendations
To address the flow of new regulation, AICD recommends:
- Strengthening scrutiny of new regulation
- Introducing systematic post-implementation reviews
- Reinstating an independent corporate law advisory body
Read the full report here.
Read our latest posts

Unlocking a Virtuous Cycle: Overcoming Barriers to AI in Australian Energy Systems
Mandala's latest research, developed in partnership with Microsoft, examines the barriers to transformative AI adoption in Australia's electricity system. The research finds that AI is one of the few tools able to unlock capacity and efficiency from the existing grid without waiting on new transmission and generation capacity, yet adoption today remains incremental. Three soft barriers, a lack of shared strategy, weak investment incentives and siloed data, are constraining Australia's ability to capture this potential. Overcoming them will require joint action from government, the technology industry and energy utilities to prove AI's value, align policy settings and fund pilots through to deployment.
8 Jul, 2026

Demonstrating the local benefits of AI infrastructure in Wisconsin
Mandala's latest research, prepared for Microsoft, examines the economic impact of hyperscale data center investment on Wisconsin's communities, businesses, and workforce. The research finds that committed data center projects will channel $16.5 billion to local suppliers, support more than 9,000 jobs during construction, and generate lasting economic activity across every county in the state, thereby extending Wisconsin's long tradition of industrial leadership into the AI era.
1 Jul, 2026

The essential infrastructure: How Australian banks power the economy
Mandala's latest research, prepared for the Australian Banking Association, examines the often-hidden role Australian banks play in supporting households, businesses and the broader economy. The research finds that banks are deeply embedded in the financial lives of Australians - as lenders, as community investors, through the jobs they generate and increasingly as assets owned by Australians themselves through shares and superannuation. From financing homes and small businesses to supporting regional communities through hardship and disaster, the report builds a picture of a sector whose success is broadly shared across the Australian population.
17 Jun, 2026

The threat of climate change to the US insurance industry
This joint report by the Coalition for an Insurable Future and Mandala Partners examines how climate change is undermining the stability of the US home insurance market. Homeowners insurance premiums have risen 38% since 2021, outpacing both inflation and wage growth, while 1 in 7 owner-occupied homes are now uninsured. Climate risk could push national premiums 35–107% higher by 2050, leave an additional 1.5–2.5 million households without cover by 2035, and cost the broader economy $1 trillion. The aggregate cost could rise to over $3 trillion by 2050. A preliminary assessment of state-level policy responses across California, Florida, Louisiana, New York and Colorado finds that effectiveness is mixed, and that the burden of costs falls primarily on homeowners, insurers and taxpayers, rather than on the sources of the underlying climate risk.
10 Jun, 2026