$160 billion and counting: The cost of Commonwealth regulatory complexity
REPORT

$160 billion and counting: The cost of Commonwealth regulatory complexity

clock

02.12.2025 - 11:44

Productivity

Our latest research for the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) reveals Australia’s growing regulatory burden. The cost to businesses of complying with federal regulation has risen to $160 billion (5.8 per cent of GDP), up from $65 billion (4.2 per cent of GDP) in 2013. More complex laws are contributing to the increase in costs and redirecting business resources away from growth and innovation. Board time on compliance has doubled from 24 percent to 55 percent in 10 years, while the external legal spend now sits at $16bn up from $6bn in 2010. While the UK, EU, Canada, New Zealand and US are simplifying regulation to drive growth, Australia risks falling further behind without taking immediate policy action.

Compliance with federal regulations costs Australia $160 billion, or around 5.8 per cent of GDP in 2024. The burden of compliance has increased since the last time Australia conducted a regulatory stocktake in 2013, when compliance was determined to cost $65 billion or 4.2 per cent of GDP. This does not include the cost of compliance with state and local government regulations, which would add additional burden.

Australia’s productivity is lower than peer countries, with a simultaneously higher regulatory burden. Productivity growth has reached its lowest point in 60 years. Australia’s productivity is much lower and our regulatory burden is higher than the OECD average. Addressing Australia’s growing regulatory burden is one lever in improving the nation’s productivity. Australia’s weak productivity growth is in part attributed to the growing regulatory burden facing our businesses. More resources being directed towards regulation drives up costs and directs effort away from productivity enhancing activities.

The regulatory landscape in Australia has expanded and become more complex in recent decades. More regulations are being added for businesses to comply with, with double the number of federal regulations and triple the pages since 2000.

Businesses are diverting resources towards compliance in response to an expanding regulatory burden. Compliance roles have doubled since 2010, shifting labour costs towards compliance and growing faster than overall employment. Across the same time period, legal spending and board time spent on compliance have both doubled.

Spending on compliance indirectly hampers business investment. A 0.1 per cent increase in the share of compliance workers, similar to the change over the past decade, is associated with a $10.4 billion reduction in investment.

Regulatory reform is urgently needed, and it requires addressing the existing stock of regulation and the flow of new regulation.

To address existing regulation, AICD recommends:

  • Committing to a 25 per cent reduction in regulatory costs by 2030
  • Lifting the thresholds for large proprietary companies and Group 3 climate reporting entities, which could save $1.7 billion over four years
  • Adopting in full the Australian Law Reform Commission’s recommendations

To address the flow of new regulation, AICD recommends:

  • Strengthening scrutiny of new regulation
  • Introducing systematic post-implementation reviews
  • Reinstating an independent corporate law advisory body

Read the full report here.

Read our latest posts

The Hidden Economy: Addressing Australia’s  Domestic Work and Care Divide
EconomicsAITechnologyGovernment

The Hidden Economy: Addressing Australia’s Domestic Work and Care Divide

Mandala’s research, in partnership with DoorDash Australia, examines the scale and distribution of Australia's unpaid household labour, the real costs it imposes on individuals and the economy, and the role that emerging technologies and policy reform could play in reducing and more equitably sharing that burden.

6 Sep, 2026

The Economic and Social Value of the Peace of Mind Foundation
HealthPro-bono

The Economic and Social Value of the Peace of Mind Foundation

Mandala's latest research, prepared for the Peace of Mind Foundation, examines the economic and social value of specialist community support for Australians living with brain cancer. The Peace of Mind Foundation delivers practical, emotional and community-based support programs for brain cancer patients and their families. Brain cancer imposes significant financial, emotional and practical burdens on patients and their families. The research finds that the Peace of Mind Foundation delivers approximately $12 million in economic value each year, equivalent to $8.40 of social return for every $1 invested, through its National Advocacy Service, its Community Brain Cancer Navigator program and its counselling and community programs. Extending this model to every new brain cancer patient in Australia is estimated to generate approximately $85 million in net economic value each year.

31 Aug, 2026

The Economic Contribution of the Data Centre Industry in Australia
DataTechnologyEnergy transition

The Economic Contribution of the Data Centre Industry in Australia

Mandala's latest research, commissioned by Data Centres Australia, shows that Australia's data centre industry is a major and growing contributor to the domestic economy. The report finds that data centres already generate $2.3 billion in annual economic activity and support around 9,450 jobs, with Australia's operational capacity set to more than double by 2030. Investment in this pipeline is forecast to deliver $19.8 billion in construction activity and 18,930 jobs by 2030. This will also lift the annual operational contribution of data centres to $5.6 billion and support 23,040 ongoing jobs. The report also highlights an opportunity for Australia to become a regional hub for AI compute exports while positioning Australia to deliver this compute more sustainably than its regional competitors.

25 Aug, 2026

The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia’s federal government
Government

The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia’s federal government

Mandala supported 4 Year Terms Australia in their latest report, "The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia's federal government", building the economic case for change. Australia is the only liberal democracy that combines a three-year term with no fixed election date. We have found that moving to fixed, four-year terms would generate up to $93 billion in economic benefits over 20 years.

17 Aug, 2026

Loading...