Unlocking Australia's R&D potential
REPORT

Unlocking Australia's R&D potential

clock

28.07.2025 - 03:26

TechnologyWorkforceEconomicsInnovationProductivityR&D

Our research in collaboration with Atlassian, the BCA and Cochlear sets out a path forward for Australia to realise its R&D potential. Australia’s productivity growth is at a 60-year low, driven in part by declining business investment in R&D. Our latest report highlights the critical role large businesses play in Australia’s innovation ecosystem and the urgent need for policy reform. Despite strong talent and institutions, Australia underperforms global peers due to high costs and uncompetitive incentives. The report outlines six targeted reforms - including simplified R&D tax incentives and a commercialisation premium - that could together generate $7.7 billion in annual economic output and lift productivity by 0.1%, with a fiscally neutral impact. With the Strategic Examination of R&D underway, this is a pivotal opportunity to restore Australia’s innovation edge.

Investment into Research and Development (R&D) plays a key role in driving productivity, which in turn leads to better living standards and economic competitiveness.

Concerningly, Australia’s business R&D spending has fallen to half that of peer countries, driven by low and declining R&D expenditure from large businesses and undermining productivity growth at a time where it is at a 60-year low. Over the past decade, large business R&D investment has declined by 24%, or $2.9 billion. Despite well-established links between R&D, productivity, and economic growth, Australia has not taken the necessary decisive action to improve R&D investment. This report identifies targeted policy measures that could help reverse the decline and unlock Australia’s R&D potential.

Large businesses anchor R&D ecosystems, making their underinvestment particularly concerning for Australia’s innovation future. This relationship is universal: no OECD country achieves strong R&D performance without substantial investment from large businesses. Australia clearly underperforms peers; large companies’ contribution to business R&D expenditure is 61% as an OECD average, compared to just 45% in Australia. The numbers illustrate this outsized influence. Just 5% of Australian businesses account for 48% of the country’s business R&D expenditure through the Research and Development Tax Incentive (R&DTI).

The impact of this investment extends far beyond the companies themselves. Large companies do not just conduct research; they generate knowledge spillovers that build innovation capacity across the entire economy. Former employees from major R&D-performing businesses have gone on to lead 1,800 other companies, collectively generating $77 billion in value added and employing 132,000 R&D workers in Australia. As large businesses pull back from R&D investment, Australia loses these multiplier effects that drive economy-wide growth, innovation, and productivity.

Australia underperforms on every dimension that drives business R&D decisions. Large businesses invest in R&D when the economics make sense; balancing costs, productivity (driven by factors including talent availability, institutions, and networks), and potential returns. While Australia has the institutional and talent foundations for strong R&D performance, it falls short when compared to international peers on costs and potential returns. Costs are relatively high, with R&D expenses 12% above the OECD average. Government support remains uncompetitive, with large business tax incentives 30% lower than in comparator countries.

Furthermore, Australia’s 30% corporate tax rate with no tax concessions for income from the domestic commercialisation of intellectual property (IP) makes domestic commercialisation less attractive, discouraging companies from developing Australian innovations locally.

Six targeted reforms could unlock $7.72 billion in annual economic output, generating $5 of value for every $1 of government expenditure over the next 10 years. These reforms are expected to cost on average $1.41 billion p.a. over this period, however the net fiscal impact is expected to be neutral when accounting for the additional tax revenue that government would make. These reforms include:

  1. Simplify R&DTI rates to a consistent offset of 18.5% above the company tax rate
  2. Remove the $150 million R&DTI cap
  3. Introduce an R&DTI collaboration premium for partnerships between businesses and higher education or government research institutions
  4. Introduce an R&D commercialisation incentive, providing a concessional tax rate of 10% for the Australian commercialisation of Australian-developed IP
  5. Streamline R&DTI compliance requirements to reduce the administrative burden on businesses
  6. Consolidate R&D grants into fewer, nationally significant programmes

This economic impact is largely driven by the productivity improvements associated with increasing R&D expenditure. In total, the proposed recommendations are expected to lift Australia’s productivity by 0.1%. This is a significant productivity reform – similar in scale to the Productivity Commission’s estimated impact of improving competition in the banking sector (0.11%) or expanding telehealth services across Australia (0.1%). The reform package will also drive an additional $2 billion in annual business R&D spending, significantly narrowing Australia’s gap with international peers.

Australia now stands at a critical juncture. The Strategic Examination of Research and Development presents a valuable opportunity to fundamentally reform Australia’s R&D policies, following years of reviews that have yet to deliver meaningful economic outcomes. With the economic case for R&D investment clearly established, Australia must move beyond analysis to the decisive action needed to restore international competitiveness and unlock the productivity growth essential for long-term economic prosperity.

Read and download the Full Report here.

Read and download the Summary Findings here.

Read and download the 1-page Factsheet here.

Read and download the Appendix - Charts and Analysis here.

Read and download the Appendix - Methodology here.

Read our latest posts

Surf, Shop, Save 2.0: How online retail is helping ease cost-of-living pressures in Australia
Retail

Surf, Shop, Save 2.0: How online retail is helping ease cost-of-living pressures in Australia

Mandala's latest research, commissioned by Amazon, examines how online channels are easing cost-of-living pressures for Australian households. The research analysed the prices of more than 95,000 products sold through online channels, constructing an Online Channel Index (OCI) to track how online prices have moved since 2019. The OCI has deflated 6 percentage points over that period, while the comparable CPI basket has risen 8 percentage points, a reflection of the competition and efficiency effects that online channels bring to the broader retail market. These effects are expected to save the average household $1,414 in 2026, roughly six weeks of grocery spending, with total savings of $7,766 since 2019. Lower-income households gain the most as a share of income. Online sales now account for 12 per cent of Australian retail, and some of the country's largest retailers are also leading omnichannel players.

22 May, 2026

Accelerating Housing Delivery Through Risk Capital Approaches
HousingCapital MarketsUnited KingdomInternational

Accelerating Housing Delivery Through Risk Capital Approaches

Mandala’s latest research, prepared with CBRE, aims to understand the benefits of shifting public-sector subsidies from grant dependence to risk capital co-investment. Risk capital is the deployment of sub-market loans to housing developments and has been applied in Greater Manchester to halve the effective public cost of subsidisation. As England grapples with a viability crisis, risk capital can provide an effective policy solution. This report models the deployment of £8.5bn from the National Housing Bank as risk capital across England. The report finds that deploying this capital within existing fiscal rules could unlock 94,000–104,000 additional homes by 2031, depending on the deployment strategy. This could crowd in £22bn in private investment, generate £5.6–£5.8bn in cumulative GDP growth, and support 71,000–73,000 jobs across England while recovering public capital with interest.

20 May, 2026

How Australia's largest industrial companies are tracking on emissions
ElectricEVsClimateEnergy transitionIndustry

How Australia's largest industrial companies are tracking on emissions

Mandala's analysis examines how emissions from Australia's largest listed industrial companies have shifted between 2020 and 2025.

18 May, 2026

How deeper EV adoption can protect the UK against oil supply shocks
EVsElectric

How deeper EV adoption can protect the UK against oil supply shocks

Mandala's research looks at how passenger electric vehicle uptake can help stretch the UK's liquid fuel supplies in times of supply shocks.

15 May, 2026

Loading...