Attracting international capital
24.11.2025 - 04:43
International investment has powered Australia's property sector, with international investors providing $1 in every $3 of institutional property investment over the past ten years. Yet in recent years, Victoria and Queensland have introduced additional taxes on these investors. This report examines a critical question: are these taxes deterring the investment Australia needs to build cities, create jobs, and support economic growth? Commissioned by the Property Council of Australia, the analysis reveals that Victoria has seen global institutional investment plummet by 53% since 2022, coinciding with rising tax rates. Queensland shows similar stagnation despite strong economic conditions. Through economic modelling and case studies of stalled projects - from student accommodation to industrial estates - the report quantifies what removing these surcharges could mean for Australia's economic future and competitiveness in attracting international capital.
Global investment makes up 29% of institutional investment in the property sector and has increased access to credit, boosted investment and supported Australian jobs
Australia has historically relied on international investment to bridge the gap between domestic savings and capital requirements, with international investors providing 29% of institutional property investment over the past decade, approximately $1 in every $3. This capital has been essential for building cities, funding infrastructure, and supporting employment across the country.
The United States dominates as the source of this investment, providing over 60% of global institutional capital flowing into Australian property. This investment has traditionally centred on New South Wales (50% of all foreign investment) and office assets (45%), though it spans all property types from industrial facilities to student accommodation.
Taxes imposed on global institutional investors in Victoria and Queensland are deterring investment
Victoria and Queensland have introduced additional taxes specifically targeting global institutional investors that go beyond what other states impose. The consequences are stark. Victoria has experienced a 53% decline in global institutional investment since 2022, falling from $10 billion to $5 billion. Queensland shows no growth despite strong economic tailwinds. Both states now receive 40% less foreign investment per capita than New South Wales. The report documents real casualties: a 201-bed student accommodation project in Melbourne indefinitely postponed, industrial investors exiting Victoria entirely, and millions redirected to overseas markets.
Removing taxes on global institutional investors will unlock $8.1B in investment, add $3.6B to GDP and support 8,400 Australian jobs
Economic modelling reveals that removing these surcharges would generate substantial returns:
- $8.1 billion in additional investment from 2026 to 2030
- $3.6 billion added to GDP nationally
- 8,400 jobs supported across the economy
The benefits far outweigh the costs. Victoria could see up to $10 in gross state product for every $1 of foregone tax revenue, with the state capturing $5.7 billion in investment and supporting 5,900 jobs. Queensland would gain $1 billion in investment and 1,000 jobs. To put this in perspective, the economic impact equals 6.2 times the annual contribution of the Australian Open to Victoria and would support 1.4 times the jobs created by the West Gate Tunnel Project.
Read and download the full report here.
Read our latest posts
Unlocking a Virtuous Cycle: Overcoming Barriers to AI in Australian Energy Systems
Mandala's latest research, developed in partnership with Microsoft, examines the barriers to transformative AI adoption in Australia's electricity system. The research finds that AI is one of the few tools able to unlock capacity and efficiency from the existing grid without waiting on new transmission and generation capacity, yet adoption today remains incremental. Three soft barriers, a lack of shared strategy, weak investment incentives and siloed data, are constraining Australia's ability to capture this potential. Overcoming them will require joint action from government, the technology industry and energy utilities to prove AI's value, align policy settings and fund pilots through to deployment.
8 Jul, 2026
Demonstrating the local benefits of AI infrastructure in Wisconsin
Mandala's latest research, prepared for Microsoft, examines the economic impact of hyperscale data center investment on Wisconsin's communities, businesses, and workforce. The research finds that committed data center projects will channel $16.5 billion to local suppliers, support more than 9,000 jobs during construction, and generate lasting economic activity across every county in the state, thereby extending Wisconsin's long tradition of industrial leadership into the AI era.
1 Jul, 2026
The essential infrastructure: How Australian banks power the economy
Mandala's latest research, prepared for the Australian Banking Association, examines the often-hidden role Australian banks play in supporting households, businesses and the broader economy. The research finds that banks are deeply embedded in the financial lives of Australians - as lenders, as community investors, through the jobs they generate and increasingly as assets owned by Australians themselves through shares and superannuation. From financing homes and small businesses to supporting regional communities through hardship and disaster, the report builds a picture of a sector whose success is broadly shared across the Australian population.
17 Jun, 2026
The threat of climate change to the US insurance industry
This joint report by the Coalition for an Insurable Future and Mandala Partners examines how climate change is undermining the stability of the US home insurance market. Homeowners insurance premiums have risen 38% since 2021, outpacing both inflation and wage growth, while 1 in 7 owner-occupied homes are now uninsured. Climate risk could push national premiums 35–107% higher by 2050, leave an additional 1.5–2.5 million households without cover by 2035, and cost the broader economy $1 trillion. The aggregate cost could rise to over $3 trillion by 2050. A preliminary assessment of state-level policy responses across California, Florida, Louisiana, New York and Colorado finds that effectiveness is mixed, and that the burden of costs falls primarily on homeowners, insurers and taxpayers, rather than on the sources of the underlying climate risk.
10 Jun, 2026