The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia’s federal government
17.08.2026 - 03:14
Mandala supported 4 Year Terms Australia in their latest report, "The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia's federal government", building the economic case for change. Australia is the only liberal democracy that combines a three-year term with no fixed election date. We have found that moving to fixed, four-year terms would generate up to $93 billion in economic benefits over 20 years.
Fixed, four-year federal terms could deliver up to $93 billion in economic benefits over 20 years, according to a new report from 4 Year Terms Australia. Mandala supported the economic case behind the report, The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia's federal government.
Australia has one of the shortest election cycles in the world. The House of Representatives has a maximum term of three years, and the Prime Minister can call an election at any point within it. Australia is the only liberal democracy that combines a three-year term with no fixed election date. Every state and territory has already moved to four-year terms, and all except Tasmania have adopted a fixed election date.
The current system carries a cost. Australians go to the polls more often than voters in comparable democracies, spending more time and money on elections, while businesses and governments carry greater uncertainty as a result. The 2025 federal election cost taxpayers more than $674 million, over three times the real cost of the 2001 election.
The report estimates that moving to fixed, four-year terms would deliver between $81 and $93 billion in benefits over 20 years, driven by three effects. Reducing the number of elections and fixing the date would lower direct election costs by $5 billion. More stable policy settings and additional time to pursue long-term reform would add between $14 and $26 billion. Greater certainty for business, who tend to defer investment during election periods, adds a further $62 billion in benefit.
There is bipartisan appetite for change. Proponents of longer terms include current and former prime ministers Anthony Albanese, John Howard, Bob Hawke and Malcolm Turnbull. Public opinion points the same way: polling by JWS Research for the report found that only one in ten Australians support the current three-year, unfixed system.
The report also sets out a practical pathway, recommending that a fixed election date be legislated first, followed by public engagement and a referendum on a four-year term.
This report builds on Mandala's 2025 research note, The value of shifting to four-year parliamentary terms, which quantified the economic benefits of moving from a three-year to a four-year federal term.
Read the full report here.
Read our latest posts
Harnessing AI in the court system
Mandala’s latest research, commissioned by Microsoft, examines how AI can help Australian courts improve access to justice by reducing persistent case backlogs. We find that three promising AI applications (smart scheduling, document review and legal research support) could deliver around 95,500 additional case finalisations a year. These applications help courts manage existing workloads more efficiently, while reinforcing the integrity of court processes.
29 Oct, 2026
Rethinking the APR
Mandala's latest research, commissioned by Block, examines whether US credit disclosure requirements remain fit for purpose in a rapidly evolving lending market. Drawing on economic analysis, a survey of nearly 1,600 US consumers and small business decision-makers, and proprietary credit data, the report finds that Annual Percentage Rate (APR) disclosures can misrepresent the perceived cost of short-term borrowing and influence consumer choices. The report makes the case for modernising credit disclosure requirements, with a more flexible approach that better reflects different credit products while preserving consumer protection and access to credit.
15 Oct, 2026
The augmented attacker: the growing AI-driven cyber threat to Australian businesses
Mandala's latest research, commissioned by CyberCX (part of Accenture), shows that the AI-driven cyber threat to Australian businesses is growing. The report finds that AI could increase the frequency and severity of cyber incidents targeting Australian businesses. As AI-driven threats grow, Australian businesses could face losses reaching up to $37 billion a year. However, investing in foundational cyber defences such as patching known vulnerabilities could reduce annual losses from $37 billion to $13 billion, a $24 billion saving. Three-quarters of the savings are from preventative actions. The report highlights the actions required from businesses and government to improve cyber defence.
13 Oct, 2026
The Stagnant Nation: Lifting Australia’s Dynamism
Australians are going backwards on real wages and income. Real wage growth has fallen from 0.6 per cent in the 2000s to -0.7 per cent today, the slowest rate since the 1990s recession. Weak productivity growth is a key driver. Productivity growth has dropped from 2.2 per cent in the 1990s to just 0.1 per cent today. The Productivity Commission has pointed to declining economic dynamism as one cause for weak growth, with fewer businesses starting, growing and competing. We confirm declining economic dynamism across five key dimensions and estimate that reversing this decline seen since the mid-2000s could see a GDP uplift of $101 billion per year over the next decade. Our analysis finds that regulation could account for around 20 per cent of declining dynamism. Reducing regulatory burden to late-2000s levels could see GDP uplift of at least $20 billion per year over the next ten years.
7 Oct, 2026