The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia’s federal government
17.08.2026 - 03:14
Mandala supported 4 Year Terms Australia in their latest report, "The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia's federal government", building the economic case for change. Australia is the only liberal democracy that combines a three-year term with no fixed election date. We have found that moving to fixed, four-year terms would generate up to $93 billion in economic benefits over 20 years.
Fixed, four-year federal terms could deliver up to $93 billion in economic benefits over 20 years, according to a new report from 4 Year Terms Australia. Mandala supported the economic case behind the report, The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia's federal government.
Australia has one of the shortest election cycles in the world. The House of Representatives has a maximum term of three years, and the Prime Minister can call an election at any point within it. Australia is the only liberal democracy that combines a three-year term with no fixed election date. Every state and territory has already moved to four-year terms, and all except Tasmania have adopted a fixed election date.
The current system carries a cost. Australians go to the polls more often than voters in comparable democracies, spending more time and money on elections, while businesses and governments carry greater uncertainty as a result. The 2025 federal election cost taxpayers more than $674 million, over three times the real cost of the 2001 election.
The report estimates that moving to fixed, four-year terms would deliver between $81 and $93 billion in benefits over 20 years, driven by three effects. Reducing the number of elections and fixing the date would lower direct election costs by $5 billion. More stable policy settings and additional time to pursue long-term reform would add between $14 and $26 billion. Greater certainty for business, who tend to defer investment during election periods, adds a further $62 billion in benefit.
There is bipartisan appetite for change. Proponents of longer terms include current and former prime ministers Anthony Albanese, John Howard, Bob Hawke and Malcolm Turnbull. Public opinion points the same way: polling by JWS Research for the report found that only one in ten Australians support the current three-year, unfixed system.
The report also sets out a practical pathway, recommending that a fixed election date be legislated first, followed by public engagement and a referendum on a four-year term.
This report builds on Mandala's 2025 research note, The value of shifting to four-year parliamentary terms, which quantified the economic benefits of moving from a three-year to a four-year federal term.
Read our latest posts
The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia’s federal government
Mandala supported 4 Year Terms Australia in their latest report, "The case for a fixed, four-year term for Australia's federal government", building the economic case for change. Australia is the only liberal democracy that combines a three-year term with no fixed election date. We have found that moving to fixed, four-year terms would generate up to $93 billion in economic benefits over 20 years.
17 Aug, 2026
Time to make a difference: Economic and fiscal benefits of Preventive Care+
Mandala's latest research, prepared for the Australian Self-Care Alliance, examines the economic and fiscal case for Preventive Care+, a proposed health assessment and coaching program for Australians aged 55 to 59. The research finds that early detection and self-care could deliver $233 million in combined health, income and fiscal benefits per cohort over ten years, including $26 million in net health system savings from delaying the progression of four common chronic conditions. Participants could also remain in the workforce for one to three additional years, generating $159 million in additional income, $19 million in additional superannuation contributions and $29 million in additional tax receipts per cohort over ten years. There are funded health checks for 45 to 49-year olds and 75 year-olds, but not for people in their late 50s, a period when chronic conditions frequently emerge and worsen. This report sets out the potential benefits of instituting a health assessment and a coaching program to intervene at a time that can yield meaningful outcomes.
23 Jul, 2026
Unlocking a Virtuous Cycle: Overcoming Barriers to AI in Australian Energy Systems
Mandala's latest research, developed in partnership with Microsoft, examines the barriers to transformative AI adoption in Australia's electricity system. The research finds that AI is one of the few tools able to unlock capacity and efficiency from the existing grid without waiting on new transmission and generation capacity, yet adoption today remains incremental. Three soft barriers, a lack of shared strategy, weak investment incentives and siloed data, are constraining Australia's ability to capture this potential. Overcoming them will require joint action from government, the technology industry and energy utilities to prove AI's value, align policy settings and fund pilots through to deployment.
8 Jul, 2026
Demonstrating the local benefits of AI infrastructure in Wisconsin
Mandala's latest research, prepared for Microsoft, examines the economic impact of hyperscale data center investment on Wisconsin's communities, businesses, and workforce. The research finds that committed data center projects will channel $16.5 billion to local suppliers, support more than 9,000 jobs during construction, and generate lasting economic activity across every county in the state, thereby extending Wisconsin's long tradition of industrial leadership into the AI era.
1 Jul, 2026